The Left is the ray of hope against cuts and racism

The result of the federal election is a slap in the face of the established, pro-capitalist parties. The only parties that won were those that many do not consider to be part of this establishment. Polarization and instability are reflected in the election result and are simultaneously reinforced by it. Above all, however, a Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) led government headed by CDU leader Friedrich Merz will try to meet the capitalists’ demands for improvements in their profit margins, something that means attacks on the working class. Trade unions and the resurgent Left Party (Die Linke) must prepare to fight against this.

The most important thing about this election, despite the doubling of the far-right Alternative for Germany’s (AfD) share of the vote, is the strong result of the Left Party, which successfully resisted the threat of parliamentary collapse and used its existential crisis as an opportunity for revival. Not only gaining more than two million more votes compared to the last federal election in 2021, but, above all, many thousands of new members give hope in view of the doubling of the AfD’s percentage result and are an opportunity to spark resistance and movement from the left.

“Whoever governs, loses”

Last year, governing parties were punished in almost all international elections. This reflects the fact that in today’s era of multiple crises of capitalism, pro-capitalist governments – whether social democratic, liberal, conservative or right-wing populist – are not pursuing policies that improve the living conditions of the masses. The reason? All of these forces are committed to capitalism and pursue policies in the interests of the capitalist class. This also applied to the outgoing German ‘traffic light’, or Ampel, coalition government [editors – named after the colours of its constituent parties – the Green Party (green), Free Democratic Party (orange) and Social-Democratic Party (red)], even though it fell apart over the question of how the interests of capitalism can best be represented.

Disaster

The disaster is particularly great for the Social Democrats, as they achieved their worst result in history, losing 3.7 million second votes. Bye, bye Olaf! [Editors – Olaf Scholz, the defeated SDP Chancellor leading the Ampel coalition government.] The Greens lost a good million votes and have fallen very low compared to their interim high in the opinion polls. Bye, bye Robert! [Editors – Robert Habeck, Green Party and vice-chancellor in the Ampel coalition government.] And the FDP, the small party of big capital, did not make it back into the Bundestag (parliament), to the delight of all wage earners, losing 3.1 million votes. Bye, bye Christian! [Editors – Christian Lindner, FDP leader and Finance Minister in the Ampel coalition government until November 2024.] The former governing parties received almost eight million fewer votes than in 2021! The CDU/CSU were only able to gain just under 2.5 million of these but also achieved the second worst result in their history. For the pro-capitalist establishment, this federal election is a huge disaster!

Polarization

Above all, the election shows the increasing polarization and instability in society. Party loyalty is decreasing more and more. While the Greens and FDP had top ratings among young voters in the 2021 federal election and this was the case with the AfD in the various elections last year, Die Linke is now ahead among young people, and especially young women. This process of fragmentation will continue and make it more difficult for the ruling class to find stable government constellations.

Small ‘Grand Coalition’?

Everything points to the formation of a government that used to be called a “grand coalition”, consisting of the CDU/CSU and SPD, but which for the first time has less than fifty percent of the vote. They only have a parliamentary majority because a good seven million voters who voted for the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), FDP and smaller parties will not be represented in parliament. Even if we are not bothered by the failure of the FDP and BSW, this is an expression of the undemocratic nature of the five percent hurdle to getting into the parliament.

This government, led by the former Black Rock manager and millionaire Friedrich Merz, will have neither a comfortable majority in the Bundestag nor a strong social base. In its first phase, it may give the impression of greater stability than the permanently quarrelling Ampel coalition, but Merz, who has had very low approval ratings for years and can only rely on a majority of twelve MPs in parliament, will not be a strong chancellor. And even if the SPD is prepared to do almost anything to keep German capitalism going, it will have to look over its shoulder at its dwindling base among wage earners and trade unionists if Merz demands that they agree to his Agenda 2030 plans.

A look at Austria, however, shows that there can be compromises between conservatives and social democrats if they are forced to do so. Merz can “buy” approval for corporate tax cuts, attacks on citizens’ income or more flexible working time regulations, for example, by agreeing to a reform of the ‘debt brake’, which he probably wants anyway because it is clear that significant sections of the capitalist class (and also the CDU/CSU) are in favour of it in order to have more scope for investments in armaments and infrastructure, which are necessary from the capitalists’ point of view.

However, this will be difficult to implement, as the governing parties, even together with the Greens, do not have the necessary two-thirds majority in the Bundestag and will have to rely on the votes of Die Linke or the AfD for constitutional changes. Accordingly, there is currently discussion about reforming the ‘debt brake’ in the “old Bundestag” or approving another special fund for the Bundeswehr. If this were to be done, it would be a further indication of the limits of even bourgeois parliamentary democracy and the willingness of those in power to ignore the so-called will of the voters. The Left Party leader, Ines Schwerdtner, has already rightly pointed out that although the party is against the debt brake, it will not support its weakening in order to favour rearmament and will also set other conditions for approval of its reform.

The capitalist class has been calling for an “economic turnaround” or Agenda 2030 for months, and a Chancellor Merz will certainly try to implement it. How far he can go and at what speed remains to be seen, and it is possible that major attacks on the social security systems and the rights of wage earners and unions will be postponed for a while. Nevertheless, unions and the left must prepare to resist this “small grand coalition”. The fact that the SPD will most likely be back in government will mean that the union leadership will back the government. That is why pressure from the grassroots is needed to push through union mobilizations and struggles – also to push through an end to the acceptance of mass job cuts, as practiced by the IG Metall leadership at Volkswagen.

At the same time, this situation also offers a great opportunity for Die Linke, which will now be the only left-wing, social and anti-militarist opposition in the Bundestag. This is true even though the Greens will certainly try to present themselves as opposition and will emphasize their ecological and social side more.

AfD

The AfD was able to almost double its percentage result and is the strongest force in East Germany, where it won almost all direct, constituency, mandates. It is profiting from the dissatisfaction and alienation of large sections of the population with the establishment and from the so-called migration debate, which was massively promoted by Friedrich Merz, Sahra Wagenknecht, other bourgeois politicians and the media, and which means wind in the sails of the right-wing populists. The idea of stealing votes from the AfD by using the harshest possible rhetoric against migrants and migration has not worked for either the CDU/CSU or the BSW. As we have always said, people are more likely to vote for the original than the copy.

The rise of the right-wing populists obscures the conflicts that exist within the AfD. After the election, Alice Weidel, co-leader of the AfD, emphasized that she was extending a hand to the CDU/CSU for participation in the government, while Björn Höcke, AfD chairperson in Thuringia, and on the extreme right of the party, spoke out against becoming the junior partner of the CDU/CSU, and other party representatives emphasized that one does not have to join a government to vote on laws. At the recent party conference, unity was maintained by sharper rhetoric from Weidel (e.g. “remigration”, i.e. expulsion of those with a migrant background) on the one hand and changes in some substantive positions on the other (e.g. abandoning the demand for an exit from the euro). How long this will remain so is an open question.

What is clear, however, is that the AfD can expand its social roots and is becoming an ever greater danger. The number of protest voters among those who vote for the AfD is decreasing. It is also clear that the so-called ‘firewall’ has developed significant cracks as a result of Friedrich Merz’s actions in connection with the Bundestag votes on the so-called “Immigration Restriction Act”, where he relied on AfD votes. These have not been repaired by all of Merz’s assurances that he does not want to cooperate with the AfD. The process of cooperation with the AfD is already in full swing at the local level. The increasingly unstable state governments in eastern Germany will sooner or later lead to AfD participation in government or even minority governments there. There is a great danger that the AfD will be the main beneficiary of the expected crisis and government policy in the next legislative period. In order to prevent this and to weaken the right-wing populists again, major class struggles and the creation of a convincing left-wing alternative are necessary.

BSW

The fact that the BSW narrowly missed the five percent target is certainly due, on the one hand, to the fact that a layer of left-leaning BSW voters could no longer follow the party due to Sahra Wagenknecht’s anti-migrant rhetoric, which was also reflected in a few prominent party resignations. On the other hand, this new party has robbed itself of its anti-establishment status by joining the state governments of Brandenburg and Thuringia. This certainly contributed to the fact that the high-flying party came to an abrupt end and Wagenknecht and Co. have now been thrown out of the Bundestag. The BSW has no strong social roots – neither in society nor in a large membership. This will now come back to haunt it. Whether the party will continue to play a role or disappear into insignificance is an open question and will certainly also depend on whether Wagenknecht herself withdraws or not. But it cannot be ruled out that the party can still sue its way into the Bundestag. And given the great instability, there is still potential for voters for the party and it would be premature to write it off now.

Die Linke

The success of Die Linke confirms the thesis we support that we are in a situation of social polarization and not a simple shift to the right. This polarization finally found political expression on the left in the election.

This is only partly due to what the leadership of Die Linke has done differently in recent months than before, and above all to the rise of the AfD, Friedrich Merz’s approach to the joint vote with the AfD in the Bundestag, and the fact that Die Linke was on the verge of parliamentary extinction. We called this the “dialectic of the existential crisis” and pointed out that it was precisely the threat of not being re-elected to the Bundestag that mobilized thousands in a rescue operation for the party, because many people realize that a country without Die Linke would be a much darker country.

These new members, the door-to-door campaign, the party’s new offers of help, the good performance of the top candidates and the consistent emphasis on social and distribution issues and the cooperation of the CDU/CSU with the AfD in the Bundestag have now triggered a dynamic that no one had expected. The amount of hope and enthusiasm that Die Linke’s comeback can trigger among a class of young people, migrants and wage earners should not be underestimated. This is probably especially true in Berlin-Neukölln, where the campaign around Ferat Koçak not only managed to win Die Linke’s first direct mandate in a western constituency (with 30 percent), but also to win hundreds of members for the party. For the first time in a long time, it is proof that there can also be positive developments “in politics”. It is good that the party leadership is emphasizing that the protest must be taken to the streets and it is to be hoped that the new members of the Bundestag who come from union struggles – such as the automobile worker Cem Ince (Volkswagen Salzgitter) or the nurse Stelle Merendino from Berlin-Mitte – will contribute to ensuring that the party and the Bundestag faction focus on supporting union struggles against job cuts, hospital closures and for better working conditions.

All of this now means a great opportunity to develop a political force from the millions of votes, the 64 Bundestag seats and thousands of new members. We have drawn up proposals (see below) and pointed out that a political change of course is necessary compared to the direction of the last few years. Because, bottom line, it was the adaptation to the SPD and the Greens, the perception of being part of the political establishment, that led Die Linke into the crisis (after it had already achieved an election result of 11.9 percent in the 2009 Bundestag election). If cuts and arms deliveries to Ukraine are supported in Bremen and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania with the participation of Die Linke in the state governments, CDU state premiers are brought into office in Saxony and Thuringia and the only reason why we do not govern with pro-capitalist parties is because they do not want to or because there is no financial possibility, it is a self-fulfilling prophecy that the party will not emerge from its crisis in the long term. This must be prevented. This requires broad debates, the involvement of members and a focus on campaigns and class struggle. In these debates, Sol members will advocate for a clear socialist programme – for Die Linke to clearly formulate a systemic alternative to capitalism, to openly address the question of ownership (i.e. to demand the transfer of banks and corporations into democratic public ownership), to speak out against participation in government with pro-capitalist parties and to focus on supporting class struggles and social protest movements.

Proposals for Party Building

The aim now is not just to turn the thousands of new members into election campaigners for a few weeks, but to activate them permanently and continue to build the party. They must be made aware that returning to the Bundestag is not the goal, but only a means of organizing resistance and further building the party – and that Die Linke can only have as much impact in the Bundestag as there are strikes, mass protests and demonstrations outside parliament.

The following different measures could help with this:

– Carrying out campaigns in which the new members can be involved: against municipal cuts, against job losses, in preparation for the coming attacks of a new federal government, against racism, against rent gouging, etc. and supporting strikes and protest movements.

– The organisation of left-wing structures where the new members are – i.e. in companies or industries or trade unions, at universities, in urban districts

– Organising a broad and democratic debate on the future policy and practice of the party, in which the controversial issues that have shaped the party in recent years and led to the party’s crisis are addressed: should the party govern together with the SPD and the Greens? What role does parliamentary activity play? What is the relationship with the unions and their leadership? Should the AfD be fought in a broad alliance with all other parties? What is left-wing migration policy? Should bombs be delivered to Ukraine? Is Die Linke in solidarity with the State of Israel?  etc. – on this basis, new elections to all party committees and of delegates to all party conferences

– Offers for political education such as reading circles, seminars introducing Marxism and the history of the workers’ movement, etc.

Liked this article? We need your support to improve our work. Please become a Patron! and support our work